Category: Economics for Business: Ch 31
The Governor of the Bank of England, Mervyn King, recently talked about the end of the ‘nice’ decade. He was not using this in its normal sense, but was taking about a ‘non-inflationary, consistently expansionary’ decade of economic growth. Economists and journalists have been busy suggesting other acronyms for the situation that we face now including VILE (‘volatile inflation, less expansionary’) and the less generous CRAP (close to recession, absent a policy’). So are we facing a new more inflationary and less stable period of economic development? Is the ‘nice’ period really over?
Recession alert as Brown fights back Guardian (15/5/08)
‘It’s things outside the Bank’s control that are going up’ Guardian (14/5/08) (Podcast)
Nasty truth behind those nice headlines Times Online (19/5/08)
Inflation prospects will make a master letter writer out of Mervyn King Times Online (13/5/08)
Which way from the edge of the abyss? Guardian (25/4/08)
Questions
1. |
Explain the main factors that have led to the past decade being a ‘NICE’ one. |
2. |
Assess the extent to which we are moving into a ‘VILE’ period . |
3. |
Evaluate two policies that the government could adopt to try to avoid the UK economy moving into a VILE period. |
In recent years Labour has taken what might be described as a light-touch on regulation of City firms and financial institutions. In the article below the economics editor of the Guardian, Larry Elliott, argues that this ‘pact with the devil’ might have come back to haunt Gordon Brown as the impact of the global credit crunch continues to dominate economic news.
Brown damned by his Faustian pact Guardian (12/5/08)
Questions
1. |
What form has regulation of the financial sector taken under the Labour government? |
2. |
Assess the extent to which this regulatory approach could be considered a ‘Faustian bargain’. |
3. |
Discuss the extent to which tighter regulation of financial markets might have helped the UK economy avoid the impact of the global credit crunch. |
Public choice theory is an area of economics that uses standard economic tools to consider the decisions made by politicians and others within the public sector. In essence the theory applies economic principles to politics. In the article below Simon Caulkin argues that public sector reform and the application of public choice theory has failed and likens the public sector reforms that have been implemented to Soviet central planning.
Labour’s public sector is a Soviet tractor factory Observer (4/5/08)
Questions
1. |
Explain what is meant by public choice theory. |
2. |
Describe the principal public-sector reforms that were implemented under the Blair government. |
3. |
Discuss the extent to which recent public-sector reforms have succeeded in delivering a more responsive and efficient public sector. |
The Chancellor Alistair Darling announced in February that Northern Rock – the beleaguered bank – was to be temporarily nationalised. The government had been unable to agree terms with prospective buyers and so decided that temporary nationalisation was the best way to proceed. The move has met with sharp criticism from shareholders and many commentators, but was supported by the Liberal Democrats who had argued from the outset that this was the best solution to the crisis.
Northern Rock shareholders will argue that nationalisation is theft Times Online (20/2/08)
Reaction to Northern Rock nationalisation Guardian (18/2/08)
‘Our shares are worthless’ say the Rock’s furious investors Times Online(18/2/08)
Northern Rock reclassified as public company Guardian (7/2/08)
Northern Rock staff warned of job cuts Guardian (7/2/08)
Q&A: Nationalised Northern Rock – what next? BBC News Online (18/2/08)
Northern Rock crisis (Special Report) BBC News Online
Video
Northern Rock nationalisation BBC News Online (February 2008)
Questions
1. |
Explain what is meant by nationalisation. |
2. |
Examine the advantages and disadvantages of privatisation. Why was privatisation introduced as a strategy in the 1980s? |
3. |
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of temporarily nationalising Northern Rock. |
The government has proposed charging a levy to people who claim non-dom (non-resident) status in the UK. This levy of £30,000 will be charged on people with non-dom status who choose to shelter their earnings in overseas tax havens. An intensive campaign against the tax has been launched by various elements of the media.
It’s hardly Bolshevism to propose taxing non-doms Guardian (9/2/08)
Treasury adviser Bob Wigley slams non-dom tax Times Online (10/2/08)
Nabbing the non-doms Times Online (10/2/08)
Jones breaks ranks to claim non-dom plan hits low-paid Guardian (9/2/08)
Non-dom crackdown could hit low-paid Guardian (8/2/08)
Questions
1. |
Explain the way in which the non-dom tax levy would operate. How would this levy be classified – progressive, regressive or flat-rate? |
2. |
Assess the arguments for and against the imposition of a levy on non-doms. |
3. |
Evaluate two alternative policies for the taxation of non-residents of the UK. |