Tag: green audits

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has just published the first part of its latest seven-yearly Assessment Report (AR6) on global warming and its consequences (see video summary). The report was prepared by 234 scientists from 66 countries and endorsed by 195 governments. Its forecasts are stark. World temperatures, already 1.1C above pre-industrial levels, will continue to rise. This will bring further rises in sea levels and more extreme weather conditions with more droughts, floods, wildfires, hurricanes and glacial melting.

The IPCC looked at a number of scenarios with different levels of greenhouse gas emissions. Even in the most optimistic scenarios, where significant steps are taken to cut emissions, global warming is set to reach 1.5C by 2040. If few or no cuts are made, global warming is predicted to reach 4.4C by 2080, the effects of which would be catastrophic.

The articles below go into considerable detail on the different scenarios and their consequences. Here we focus on the economic causes of the crisis and the policies that need to be pursued.

Global success in reducing emissions, although partly dependent on technological developments and their impact on costs, will depend largely on the will of individuals, firms and governments to take action. These actions will be influenced by incentives, economic, social and political.

Economic causes of the climate emergency

The allocation of resources across the world is through a mixture of the market and government intervention, with the mix varying from country to country. But both market and government allocation suffer from a failure to meet social and environmental objectives – and such objectives change over time with the preferences of citizens and with the development of scientific knowledge.

The market fails to achieve a socially efficient use of the environment because large parts of the environment are a common resource (such as the air and the oceans), because production or consumption often generates environmental externalities, because of ignorance of the environmental effects of our actions, and because of a lack of concern for future generations.

Governments fail because of the dominance of short-term objectives, such as winning the next election or appeasing a population which itself has short-term objectives related to the volume of current consumption. Governments are often reluctant to ask people to make sacrifices today for the future – a future when there will be a different government. What is more, government action on the environment which involves sacrifices from their own population, often primarily benefit people in other countries and/or future generations. This makes it harder for governments to get popular backing for such policies.

Economic systems are sub-optimal when there are perverse incentives, such as advertising persuading people to consume more despite its effects on the environment, or subsidies for industries producing negative environmental externalities. But if people can see the effects of global warming affecting their lives today, though fires, floods, droughts, hurricanes, rising sea levels, etc., they are more likely to be willing to take action today or for their governments to do so, even if it involves various sacrifices. Scientists, teachers, journalists and politicians can help to drive changes in public opinion through education and appealing to people’s concern for others and for future generations, including their own descendants.

Policy implications of the IPCC report

At the COP26 meeting in Glasgow in November, countries will gather to make commitments to tackle climate change. The IPCC report is clear: although we are on course for a 1.5C rise in global temperatures by 2040, it is not too late to take action to prevent rises going much higher: to avoid the attendant damage to the planet and changes to weather systems, and the accompanying costs to lives and livelihoods. Carbon neutrality must be reached as soon as possible and this requires strong action now. It is not enough for government to set dates for achieving carbon neutrality, they must adopt policies that immediately begin reducing emissions.

The articles look at various policies that governments can adopt. They also look at actions that can be taken by people and businesses, actions that can be stimulated by government incentives and by social pressures. Examples include:

• A rapid phasing out of fossil fuel power stations. This may require legislation and/or the use of taxes on fossil fuel generation and subsidies for green energy.
• A rapid move to green transport, with investment in charging infrastructure for electric cars, subsidies for electric cars, a ban on new petrol and diesel vehicles in the near future, investment in hydrogen fuel cell technology for lorries and hydrogen production and infrastructure, cycle lanes and various incentives to cycle.
• A rapid shift away from gas for cooking and heating homes and workplaces and a move to ground source heating, solar panels and efficient electric heating combined with battery storage using electricity during the night. These again may require a mix of investment, legislation, taxes and subsidies.
• Improvements in energy efficiency, with better insulation of homes and workplaces.
• Education, public information and discussion in the media and with friends on ways in which people can reduce their carbon emissions. Things we can do include walking and cycling more, getting an electric car and reducing flying, eating less meat and dairy, reducing food waste, stopping using peat as compost, reducing heating in the home and putting on more clothes, installing better insulation and draught proofing, buying more second-hand products, repairing products where possible rather than replacing them, and so on.
• Governments requiring businesses to conduct and publish green audits and providing a range of incentives and regulations for businesses to reduce carbon emissions.

It is easy for governments to produce plans and to make long-term commitments that will fall on future governments to deliver. What is important is that radical measures are taken now. The problem is that governments are likely to face resistance from their supporters and from members of the public and various business who resist facing higher costs now. It is thus important that the pressures on governments to make radical and speedy reductions in emissions are greater than the pressures to do little or nothing and that governments are held to account for their actions and that their actions match their rhetoric.

Articles

• Some climate changes now irreversible, says stark UN report

Channel 4 News, Alex Thomson (9/8/21)

• Climate change: IPCC report is ‘code red for humanity’

BBC News, Matt McGrath (10/8/21)

• Climate change: Five things we have learned from the IPCC report

BBC News, Matt McGrath (10/8/21)

• Climate Scientists Reach ‘Unequivocal’ Consensus on Human-Made Warming in Landmark Report

Bloomberg Green, Eric Roston and Akshat Rathi (9/8/21)

• Climate change: Seven key takeaways from the IPCC climate change report

Sky News, Philip Whiteside (10/8/21)

• IPCC report: global emissions must peak by 2025 to keep warming at 1.5°C – we need deeds not words

The Conversation, Keith Baker (9/8/21)

• This is the most sobering report card yet on climate change and Earth’s future. Here’s what you need to know

The Conversation, Pep Canadell, Joelle Gergis, Malte Meinshausen, Mark Hemer and Michael Grose (9/8/21)

• IPCC report: how to make global emissions peak and fall – and what’s stopping us

The Conversation, Matthew Paterson (9/8/21)

• World’s 1.5C goal slipping beyond reach without urgent action, warns landmark IPCC climate report

Independent, Daisy Dunne and Louise Boyle (9/8/21)

• IPCC report: 14 ways to fight the climate crisis after publication of ‘Code Red’ warning

Independent, Harry Cockburn (10/8/21)

• Major climate changes inevitable and irreversible – IPCC’s starkest warning yet

The Guardian, Fiona Harvey (9/8/21)

• Climate scientists have done their bit. Now the pressure is on leaders for COP26.

CNN, Ivana Kottasová and Angela Dewan (10/8/21)

• 21 For 21: The Climate Change Actions Scotland Needs Now

Common Weal, Common Weal Energy Policy Group (9/8/21)

• How to build support for ambitious climate action in 4 steps

The Conversation, Sarah Sharma and Matthew Hoffmann (4/3/21)

• Scientists have finally added world politics to their climate models

Quartz, Michael J Coren (9/8/21)

Report

• Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis

IPCC (August 2021)

Questions